Task force members urge Homeland Security to suspend Secure Communities
Former task force members asked the department to halt the immigration-enforcement program, raising questions about local cooperation, civil rights and federal oversight.
Reporting and historical context on homeland security, immigration enforcement, military policy, foreign affairs and the public institutions responsible for oversight.
Former task force members asked the department to halt the immigration-enforcement program, raising questions about local cooperation, civil rights and federal oversight.
An organization known for anti-Muslim advocacy planned an event honoring military personnel in Tallahassee as the state legislative session began.
The department terminated immigration-enforcement arrangements with the Maricopa County sheriff's office amid concerns over its practices.
The department announced a large review of deportation proceedings intended to apply prosecutorial-discretion guidance across pending cases.
This archive report examines how immigration enforcement and a controversial local official entered the 2012 presidential campaign.
Republican candidates debated whether enforcement proposals should include a path for some undocumented residents to remain in the country.
A former state senator argued that his role in Arizona's immigration-enforcement law did not determine the outcome of his recall election.
The Florida senator addressed candidates' foreign-policy positions, immigration questions and speculation about the vice presidency.
A bipartisan Senate vote advanced part of a jobs proposal that offered tax incentives to companies employing military veterans.
An archival survey found likely caucus participants preferred reducing military spending over cuts to Medicare or Social Security.
How federal departments, courts, Congress and local agencies divide responsibility and face public review.
The legal rules, administrative choices and rights concerns behind immigration and security programs.
What legislation, spending decisions, official memoranda and documented outcomes reveal about policy.
We identify the administration, election cycle and policy framework relevant to each report.
We distinguish the roles of agencies, courts, lawmakers and state or local officials.
Official documents and direct records carry more weight than unsupported allegations.
Readers should verify whether laws, programs and officeholders have changed since publication.
The section includes immigration enforcement, homeland security, military spending, veterans policy, foreign aid, civil liberties and oversight of federal security powers.
Not necessarily. Many articles document earlier policy debates. Check the article's historical setting and compare it with current statutes, agency guidance and court decisions.
Earlier federal debates frequently linked immigration enforcement with homeland-security agencies. Coverage should still distinguish immigration administration from evidence-based assessments of security threats.
Identity alone is not evidence. Reliable assessment requires specific claims, verifiable documents, direct responses and careful attention to civil liberties.
Browse the main Issues page or the archive's older posts.
Send the article URL, the disputed statement and supporting documentation to info@washingtonindependent.com-html.com.